Milton's Shakespeare: A Digest of Media Coverage

September 18, 2019 Claire M. L. Bourne

Suggested emendations to the text of ‘Romeo & Juliet’ in the Free Library of Philadelphia’s First Folio. [Reproduced with kind permission of the Free Library of Philadelphia’s Rare Book Department.]

Since my last post, there has been a flurry of media interest around the news of the very real possibility that the copy of the Shakespeare First Folio at the Free Library of Philadelphia once belonged to—and is indeed annotated by—John Milton. Jason Scott-Warren floated this claim on Cambridge’s Centre for Material Texts blog early last week. His post was shared and vetted widely on social media and quickly picked up by the mainstream press.

It has been heartening to see at least some of the coverage pick up on the way Jason was able to identify Milton as the plausible reader of this book, rather than focusing squarely on the discovery. In particular, see the pieces in The Philadelphia Inquirer and The New York Times and listen to Jason’s interview on BBC Radio 4’s Front Row. For a corrective to some of the reporting that characterizes the book as previously “hidden” and “languishing” in the Free Library, see Free Library rare book curator Caitlin Goodman’s op-ed for The Inquirer.

Click through for a digest of media coverage. I will continue to update this list, so please feel free to contact me if you come across an article, radio bit, or TV segment not listed.

With(out) Milton: Dating the Annotations in the Free Library of Philadelphia's First Folio

September 13, 2019 Claire M. L. Bourne

Detail of manuscript emendation and bracketing in the Free Library of Philadelphia’s copy of Mr William Shakespeares Comedies, Histories, & Tragedies (1623). [Image reproduced with kind permission of the Free Library of Philadelphia.] — Detail of manuscript emendation and bracketing in the Free Library of Philadelphia’s copy of *Mr William Shakespeares Comedies, Histories, & Tragedies* (1623). [Image reproduced with kind permission of the Free Library of Philadelphia.]

Book history is full of dead ends, lost threads, and rabbit holes that lead to nowhere. You can work for a decade, as I did, on a single book—observing, describing, analyzing, hypothesizing, gathering corroborating evidence, following up on provenance leads, etc.—and still be left with gaping holes in the narrative of why the book ended up where it ended up and how it ended up in its present state.

For me, that book is an annotated copy of Mr William Shakespeares Comedies, Histories, & Tragedies (1623), known colloquially as the First Folio, now housed at the Free Library of Philadelphia’s Rare Book Department. More than 250 copies of this book survive and many of them show some evidence of early readership. So what makes this one different? Access, for one. In 1899, the book attracted the attention of Sidney Lee, who would be the first person to attempt a comprehensive census of extant copies of Comedies, Histories, & Tragedies. It has also been described in Anthony J. West’s Census (2001) and Eric Rasmussen and West’s more recent Descriptive Catalogue (2012). But it has never attracted scholarly attention, most likely because it would be very difficult to find unless you knew to look for it. It is not catalogued online, nor has it been digitized. Furthermore, it is housed in a public library that, despite its impressive special collections, is not frequented by many scholars working on early modern drama. Indeed, I heard about this copy by word-of-mouth from Peter Stallybrass when I was a graduate student in Philadelphia. He thought the annotations were interesting, and he encouraged me to see what I could find out.

Navigating New-to-You Rare Book & Special Collection Libraries: A Working List of Questions to Ask

March 31, 2019 Claire M. L. Bourne

Early modern play quartos with fresh call slips in the reading room at the Harry Ransom Center (UT-Austin).

I have spent a good deal of time in rare book and manuscript libraries over the past twelve years: as a graduate student doing coursework at two universities with strong special collections; as a researcher requiring first-hand access to thousands of discrete book objects for a monograph on early modern playbook typography; and as a teacher of classes designed around book historical modes of reading and inquiry.

By this point, I might even call myself an “experienced” user of such institutions. But if I have learned anything from fellowship tenures and short research visits to libraries as big as the British Library and as small as the Eberly Family Special Collections Library at Penn State (where I now work), it is that no two special collections libraries are the same in their researcher protocols; or in how their collections are organized, catalogued, and accessed. My effort this spring to do exactly the same kind of research at the Harry Ransom Center and the Beinecke Rare Book & Manuscript Library under similar time constraints has underscored the extent to which institution-specific histories, priorities, and policies (i.e., the things that have gone on—and are going on on—behind the scenes) shape how readers like me and you approach and use the collections.[1]

Sometimes it can be confusing. So, here’s the truth: I still feel daunted every time I visit a library I have not worked in before, or return to one I have not used in a while. Not only do I have to figure out what I want to look at, how to locate it in the catalogue, and how to physically access it; but there is also a slew of far more basic matters: registering as a reader; navigating the library building and designated research spaces; figuring out what I can bring into the reading room with me and where to put all the stuff I can’t; interfacing with the circulation desk and security staff; locating the bathroom; gaining permission to take photographs (if that’s allowed); finding outlets for my chargers; getting on the local wifi network; etc.

It would be impossible to write a quick and general “how to” guide for using special collections libraries since all these institutions are so different. However, knowing what questions to ask from the start (and who to ask) can make a research stint at one of these institutions more efficient and productive—and, if you’re like me, less intimidating. While online orientation and research guides are getting better all the time, it has been my experience that meeting with the people who work closely with the collections on a daily basis—reference librarians, curators, and other members of staff—is the most effective way of getting acquainted with the library. Their expertise is invaluable.

With this in mind, I have compiled a working list of questions that I find useful to ask before and during my time in a new reading room.

READ MORE . . .